Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Larry Kaufman's "Solutions" in CCR Test

Author: Ulrich Tuerke

Date: 14:51:45 05/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 04, 2001 at 17:01:29, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On May 04, 2001 at 16:27:34, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>
>>On May 04, 2001 at 14:12:01, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>
>>>On May 04, 2001 at 13:35:09, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I checked out a few of the "solutions" given in the One Hour CCR Test with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nunn's Chess Openings (I was building an opening book with MCO14 but found so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>many errors I gave up) and have not found one yet that is "incorrect."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  #5 Solution 5...e5 NCO suggests that "with counterplay."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If I enable comet's book, it wants to play e6 here. So, this seems to be an
>>>>>>>>>>>alternative.
>>>>
>>>>  Most opening books give evaluations of approximately equal chances for both
>>>>sides.  I would stick with the positional evaluation of an International Master
>>>>unless I had good authority to do otherwise.
>>>
>>>Any GM ever played e6? or they are games from not so strong players?
>>>Historically, e5 has been *the* move and the reason why White should play 3.Nf3
>>>rather than 3.e4. I learned this from a GM (O.Panno) long time ago. Did things
>>>change?
>>
>>After all, a world champion had played e6 (some time ago) in
>>
>>Saemisch - Alekhine, Carlsbad 1923,  1/2
>
>Yes, but Deep Alekhine would have played e5 :-)

Ain't easy to argue with you -:)

Uli

>
>Miguel
>
>>
>>Can't be that bad.
>>>
>>>Miguel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.