Author: José Carlos
Date: 10:26:36 05/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2001 at 12:46:51, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On May 15, 2001 at 10:43:25, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>This game is from the Israeli final of correspondence games.
>>
>>All the moves of black were suggested by Deep Fritz's opening book or Deep
>>Fritz's search.
>>
>>I believe that white is the only player who does not use a computer in the final
>>The other players who do not use a computer were eliminated on previous stages.
>>
>>[Event "correspondence"]
>>[Site "tel-aviv"]
>>[Date "2001.05.14"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "David vaichel"]
>>[Black "uri blass"]
>>[Result "*"]
>>[ECO "B82"]
>>[PlyCount "60"]
>>[EventDate "2001.05.14"]
>>
>>{8192kB. Pentium200} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3
>>e6 7. f4 b5 8. Qf3 Bb7 9. Bd3 Nbd7 10. g4 b4 11. Nce2 e5 12. Nb3 d5 13. Ng3 Qc7
>>14. g5 Nxe4 15. Nxe4 Rc8 16. Ng3 d4 17. Be4 Bxe4 18. Qxe4 dxe3 19. O-O-O g6 20.
>>fxe5 Be7 21. h4 Nxe5 22. Nd4 Nc4 23. Rhg1 O-O 24. b3 Na3 25. Nge2 Rfe8 26. Qd3
>>Qe5 27. Rg4 Nxc2 28. Kb1 Na3+ 29. Kb2 Bc5 30. Rc1 Nb5 *
>>
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>Am I missing something? Ie what is the _point_ of playing chess using a
>computer, particularly if the computer suggests _every_ move???
Not that I like the idea, but it can make sense if you can use a number of
programs. Deciding which one is right in a non tactical position is a tough
work, and can _possibly_ show chess understanding.
Kind of same change in the way of thinking as can be for a 'live' player to
play correspondence ("what's the point if you can actually move the pieces on
the board?").
José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.