Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: O(1) garbage

Author: Alberto Rezza

Date: 05:39:35 05/17/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2001 at 19:12:23, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Chess is finite.  TSP is finite.  Matrix multiplication is finite.  All
>algorithms are finite.  Otherwise, they AREN'T algorithms.

Come on, Dann. Termination of algorithms and finiteness of a game are
two totally unrelated matters. Is that so difficult to understand?

If chess is too much, try with tic-tac-toe. A few hundred nodes, and
you cannot increase the depth anymore: all leaves are won, lost or
drawn, there is nothing left to expand. It is finite, so it is O(1)
time. And chess is the same, for the same reason.

With matrix multiplication, after multiplying two nxn matrixes, you
can always find two (n+1)x(n+1) matrixes to try. The algorithm WILL
terminate, but it will take longer: for any time duration T, you can
find an input large enough that it takes more than T to compute, so it
is not O(1).

Alberto



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.