Author: Chessfun
Date: 01:50:33 05/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2001 at 02:56:03, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 19, 2001 at 15:34:15, william penn wrote: > >>i suspect that cm6555 would still score among the top three, even against the >>best and newest programs. Cm8000 is a rip-off since there is a noticable >>decrease in strength from the previous more strong version 6000 > >Is there any evidence of this? Who has played enough games between CM8000 and >CM6555 or vs other top programs? It's a pity that most people working with a >specific CM8 personalities don't take the time to play on higher time controls >vs other top programs. And as long as someone has not played 100 games and more >any statements are statistically worthless. Below once more my results with >CM8_Utzinger: No offence but I don't see how 10 games per program is statistically relevant either. Especially when it produces a score like 9-1 with Hiarcs 7.32. >RESULTS >CM8_Utzinger with kostick.obk >Standings per 5th May 2001 > >Settings >Style: A/D=-10; SoP=100; Ra=0; MDS=99; SS=8; CoD=0, TT=64, P=on >Positional: MP=0, CoC=110; Mob=125; KS=150; PP=110; PW=100 >Material: own Q=9.2; opp Q=9; own R=5.2; opp R=5; own B=3.2; opp B=3; K=3; P=1 > >Download address for kostick.obk = http://members.aol.com/br5an/cmtourn.zip > >CM8_Utzinger (time control 40/40) >- vs AnMon 5.10 [8.5-1.5] score 85 % >- vs Chess Tiger 13 [6-4] score 60 % >- vs Chess Tiger 14 [3-7] score 30 % >- vs Fritz6b [5.5-4.5] score 55 % >- vs Gambit Tiger 1.0 [8-2] score 80 % >- vs Gambit Tiger 2.0 [3.5-6.5] score 35 % >- vs Gandalf 4.32h [5.5-4.5] score 55 % >- vs Hiarcs 7.32 [9-1] score 90 % >- vs Junior6a [6-4] score 60 % >- vs LG2000v3 [2.5-0.5] score 83 % >- vs Nimzo 7.32 [5.5-4.5] score 55 % >- vs Shredder 4.0 [5-5] score 50 % >- vs Shredder 5.0 [1.5-8.5] score 15 % >- vs Yace 0.99 [8-5] score 61 % >- vs Zchess 2.22 [7-3] score 70 % >Total 146 games, 84.5-61.5 in favour of CM8_Utzinger, Score 58 % > >Where different hardware is used the program with the black color has always the >faster PC and each program program receives the fastest computer the same number >of times. > >Kurt What was the hardware? I see the above statement but I'm looking for what the two Pc's were. Were the winboard programs run in a CB gui? Were the CB programs all using their own books? Were the CB programs opening books optimized. Where can I download all these games? I am interested in a few of these scores and will run some games also. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.