Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Cm6555 is definitely the strongest Chessmaster around.

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 03:50:45 05/20/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2001 at 04:41:35, Chessfun wrote:

>On May 20, 2001 at 04:08:23, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On May 20, 2001 at 03:10:31, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>We're talking about CM7000 and 8000. Aren't they upgrades to CM6000 (and 6555)?
>>>Even if not advertised as such It is the clear assumption as it has the same
>>>name, and the numbers continue from there. i.e CM7000 coming after CM6000 (and
>>>it's offshoots).
>
>CM6555 is simply another modified version of the CM6000 much the same
>as you are now seeing modified engine tournaments of CM8000 personalities.
>
>>No, they're new versions IMO. And a new version doesn't automatically mean
>>upgrade or strength improvement. It can just as easily be a question of changing
>>the concept. CM7000 was a dubious release compared to CM6000 judging from the
>>little I know about both of them.
>
>Totally correct. The CM7000 was the same engine as the CM6000 excluding
>the fact that the hash setting couldn't be modified whereas with the CM6000
>it could.
>
>>However, I think that CM8000 has a number of new features. The most prominent
>>one being something resembling WinBoard support and an autoplay feature as a
>>result of that. And since I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that the engine
>>is weaker (or stronger), the criticism is a little void of meaning.
>
>The CM8000 is a vast overall improvement over the CM6000. The additional
>features aside from winboard support and by chance :-) autoplay which wasn't
>actually a CM idea, there is the instant analysis and multi engine instant
>analysis. As well as various other user enhancements which while they may not
>serve the average CM buyer were things that were cried out for by the likes of
>users at this forum.
>
>I still myself haven't seen anything that leads me to believe that the CM8K
>is any weaker than the CM6K.
>
>Sarah.

Neither have I.
Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.