Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:56:43 04/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 1998 at 18:17:03, Peter Fendrich wrote: >I think you missed my point... >These kind of questions always comes down to philosophy or even >religion. >And hopefully not mainly to political or statistical issues. Right. The problem are not FACTS and DATA or EVIDENCE . The problem is always: what do the people think about those "FACTS" or "DATA". The interpretation is the problem. And this happens in the minds !! So - if you get a number out of the chess-set, what does the number stand for ? IMO it does NOT show the strength. Like the IQ does not show intelligence. I agree with you. I still believe Michael Reiter did a good job in his positional test-suite. Maybe we should ask him to do some more tests....
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.