Author: Mike S.
Date: 22:12:41 05/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2001 at 13:32:44, James T. Walker wrote: >(...) >(not sure if diagram will show up----haven't done it in a long time) > >[D]R7/8/3K4/8/7P/5P2/3p4/1k6 w - - > >Here Deep Shredder abandoned the perpetual check and played 75. Ke5 ?? Three >moves later Deep Shredder announced "Mate in 53" on itself. :( When perpetual check is involved, it's better to have the complete game score. If you can post the PGN of this game, other DS owners can try if the problem is reproduceable better (as far as I can tell from the previous replies, it's not reproduceable from the EPD position, so I didn't try it myself). Which tablebases have been used? Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.