Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM98 Analysis 51-100

Author: Howard Exner

Date: 18:05:19 04/26/98

Go up one level in this thread


On April 24, 1998 at 14:27:23, Don Dailey wrote:

>Hi Howard,
>
>I don't know what you mean by "book error".

I own the book, "Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames" and as I play
through the combinations I am recording the errors that  are in the
book.
The common scenario is the defending side missing a good defensive move,
thus wrecking the "combination". This I think depicts one of the many
strengths of computer programs - defending well against combinations.
I'm using Rebel but the other programmers were finding similar errors
using their programs. Some of the errors were quite comical. In one of
the
problems the winning side blissfully went on to victory only because the
defender side missed delivering a mate in one himself! Back in 1980
when this book was written they did not have the convenience of double
checking the lines with computers. Chess Challenger most likely would
recommended pushing the a pawn two squares for the majority of  the
problems.
>
>I'm glad your redacting the ECM set.  I orignally agreed to do
>this but got too busy and had a death in the family.  Sorry I couldn't
>help you out.

We felt your absence in putting this together. I went back and
downloaded
all the posts related to ECM98 and am coming to a similar conclusion
that
you made in the early posts. You mentioned that you would like to see
a clean suite with problems that were not "flaky" - moves that really
did not create a decisive combination. Those for the most part are these
broken ones with faulty defensive lines (book errors I call them). I
agree
that this would be a nice practical collection if these indecisive
problems
were axed.

If you would like to take over the project again I would certainly not
object.
It's nice to have you back on CCC.

>
>- Don
>
>
>
>On April 24, 1998 at 07:16:35, Howard Exner wrote:
>
>>On April 24, 1998 at 04:43:59, Manfred Rosenboom wrote:
>>>Hi Howard,
>>>
>>>yesterday I upoaded the following two files to my web area:
>>>
>>>http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/2640/ECM98.zip
>>>    (your file with all the ECM98 positions)
>>>
>>>http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/2640/ECM98pgn.zip
>>>    (my version with all bm opcodes in PGN notation)
>>
>>I'll download the one with the opcodes in PGN notation. This is the
>>version
>>I'll edit as there are a number of positions that will no doubt need to
>>be dropped from the suite. I've also been discovering some input errors
>>I made (wrong epd files and wrong key move entered). I may just take
>>the roll of the benevolent dictator and just delete all the ones I'm
>>finding that had book errors in them . Does that sound OK to those that
>>are involved in this modified ECM?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.