Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM suite draft 1 from 20.4: RESULTS

Author: Howard Exner

Date: 12:30:15 04/27/98

Go up one level in this thread


On April 27, 1998 at 05:23:07, Amir Ban wrote:

>On April 27, 1998 at 02:48:54, Howard Exner wrote:
>
>
>>
>>The major question I have now is should I include all the positions not
>>mentioned in the errata threads?
>
>No doubt. Let's have a correct ECM for a start. Since you have all the
>post history, you know that some want a large suite, some want a
>difficult one, others want want that is not "flaky", but everyone wants
>it to be correct.

Yes I see what I did here. I used the list given by Bruce Moreland's
first
pass. As your errata posts rolled in I noticed that everyone of them
were on
that same list by Bruce. I concluded (wrongly now I see) that you were
working off of Bruce's list.

This will be easy to correct and the suite will be bigger now. The one
good
thing from this is that I've been going over that list I posted (ecm98
draft)
and double checked for positions where the defense broke down and erred.

What I'll do now is first post all the ones we should drop from the
big original ecm. Those are mostly from the errata postings and a few
I've
found in going over my first draft.
>
>Amir



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.