Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why the sudden urge to proclaim programs as GMs?

Author: Côme

Date: 07:24:57 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2001 at 10:19:57, Chris Carson wrote:

>Again.  ELO is what I am talking about.  Not opinion about a position in a game.
> Everyone is entitled to an opinion.  Mine may be different than yours and my GM
>friends may disagree with yours.  Results is what I am talking about.  Show me a
>tournament, or set one up to prove your 2200 statement.  I will believe results.
>
>To be fair to you.  ISR2000 has some of the worst program results (some were
>still good), I include these in the games I reference and I make no excuses for
>any progams performance.  Those performances are included in the 2500 and 2600
>calculations.
>
>I am talking ELO and I can show written IM and GM opinions on both sides of the
>how do programs play argument.  I value results, I have always said that, I get
>tired of repeating myself.
>
>Best Regards,
>Chris Carson

I undestand what you say but is is obviously a wrong approach :-)
Best regards
Alexandre Côme



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.