Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 15:05:17 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
Hi On June 27, 2001 at 16:54:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: [snip] >The author demands too much. He's demanding much more generalized human-style >intelligence. It's possible to be intelligent in a smaller domain. A program >doesn't have to be able to write a sonnet before you can apply the term >"intelligent" to it other than as marketing hype. > >bruce That's part of what I meant in a previous post. Some have such a generalized "definition of intelligence" that as long as an engine doesn't go to school when it's 8 years old and maybe marries another engine some years later, it's not considered intelligent. If you define intelligence in such a human-style way, there's already another word for it: human. Regards, Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.