Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 00:00:12 06/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
> >Not exactly the same. > >Program have weaknesses at all time control but I proved that at least one of >his games with Na3 could not be won at tournament time control. > >I am sure that in more games programs may play better and I simply did not check >it. I have seen so many games from Eduard, different opposites, different time levels, different openings (he even asked people to give him an opening where he should beat a program, and he did). So what's the use of saying: this move isn't reproducable under different time controls? Eduard plays better in tournament levels too. I suggest to all people who don't believe this reading his articles in ChessBits. He showed a system against sicilian (which works against 1. e4 e5 too) which works at all levels against nearly all programs. >> >>>He is playing tricks, do it over the board at 40/2 under tournament conditions. >>>He can't do it, unless he knows the programs book, but if you change the way the >>>program played a slight bit he would be lost again. For Eduard to win, he must >>>expolit the computer openness. >> >>What are you talking about? have you even bothered to look at any of his games?. >>The programs are out of book at move 2. So what's the book got to do with >>anything?. > >At tournament conditions the programmer can change the book and Eduard is not >going to have a possible way to get the program out of book at move 2. You can't avoid everything by a good book. You can't have 1. e4 c5 2. e5, 1.e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. a3 e6. 4. d3,... If you improve the book humans will find weaknesses which work for this book. > >The number of positions after 2 moves is big enough and it is possible to have >some replies in book against 1.e4 c5 2.Na3 and every short bad line of white. > >Uri Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.