Author: K. Burcham
Date: 09:35:07 07/01/01
i am still trying to define my opinion on this subject. i have watched and analysed many GM vs comp games. blunders by GMs are very common. i do not know what to think about the small qroup of what some people call super gms. these guys also blunder against comps. for example in the anand vs kramnik match when kramnik sacked the bishop and took the pawn. if another GM had not seen this game, and we set the position up for another GM to make a move at this point in the same game---there is no way he would sack the bishop and lose the game. and neither would kramnik if this same position were set up for him to analyse(if he had not seen it before). there are so many opinions posted here by qualified people on this subject. but i would like to see a list of GM levels defined in detail. maybe about six different levels of GM defined, and detailed, how a GM is expected to play in each level. including expected blunders per game. just curious
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.