Author: martin fierz
Date: 06:31:29 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 09:03:48, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 08:35:02, martin fierz wrote: > >>hi mark! >> >>why don't you look at the game instead of at the number of moves? this is no >>crush. white was much better and blundered. > >Probably he was intimidated by his strong opponent... > >>look at the variations on the >>chessbase web page. >> > >I looked at the variations and I've seen a wonderful queen sacrifice by Tiger. yes, tiger wins with some tactics. around move 15 white is just better - good pressure against b7 and afterwards c6. i'm not saying white is winning - far from it, but he has a pleasant position. and he blunders when it gets sharp. some people think that "crush = win in less than N moves". to crush someone in chess is to outplay him. that's not what the tiger did. i'm not saying it's weak or not GM level or anything - only there are some enthusiasts here who probably have about 1200 rating and cannot see what is happening... cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.