Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 11:04:02 07/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2001 at 13:24:56, Dana Turnmire wrote: >On July 12, 2001 at 13:22:49, John Dahlem wrote: > >>The only part of his post that I consider possibly offensive is the profanity, >>which he warned about in his title. He _realized_ it may be offensive to some >>and took action to ensure he would not offend anyone. > > So we admit that there is such a thing as profanity! What is obviously >profane should be left in profane places. Dana why did you read john's post when is clearly say's in the header that it contains profanity? you seem to get really offended by profanity so maby in the future when the header states that the post include profanity, you might want to go along and skip reading such post's. While i don't agree with using profanity in a place like here, i do not get offended by it, i am mature enough to handle it, but some of the readers/posters here are not and i do believe they should stay away from reading posts that states they contain profanity. I believe that we where given free wil to exercise it responably, but it goe's two ways you chose to read a post that contained profanity (which it said in the header) and when you know that you are offended by profanity, by reading that post you chose to get offended. Regards Jonas Ps: please read the header again
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.