Author: José Carlos
Date: 00:15:48 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 12:39:43, odell hall wrote: >On July 15, 2001 at 10:57:47, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On July 15, 2001 at 07:58:10, odell hall wrote: >> >>>Don't do what you did on the Van Diel Wiel match and Renig, you said if rebel >>>beat Van Der Wiel then computers are GM's , But you back out. >> >>First Dr. Hyatt is away for a week. So he won't even see you message! Didn't you >>read he was off for a holiday? > > > No, I didn't , But I am sure he atleast took a laptop with him. > > >> >>Second, GM John van der Wiel played a very short match with Rebel Century, and >>the first time he'd ever lost a match to computer, and that was by a mere point. > > Your Wrong it was by two points, but our of "respect" or Perhaps "Charity" Ed >gave him a Draw by he was completley Lost. the score should have been 4-2, a >Crush!! >> > >>GM John van der Wiel is an excellent player but not a 2600+ GM, at least not at >>present. Yet he could turn a second match with Rebel Century around I'm sure. >>Not putting down Rebel, it's an excellent chess program, but not a World Class >>GM 2600+, at least not yet!;) > > >Because you are sure, doesn't mean that it is a Fact, it is Empty Speculation, >the same as me saying Kasparov in a return match would beat Deepblue, that >doesn't make it true, it is just a "belief" > > >>Third, GM Huebner isn't a young man anymore, so I doubt he can play like he is! >> > > >I suspect you think he will lose so you are preparing an excuse before hand? You >are a Good student of Dr. Hyatt i can see. But the Truth is Huebner is still >extremely strong since he is Maintaining a 2600 elo, which is stronger than 99% >of Grandmasters in America!!! Old doesn't neccecarily mean Weak, so whats your >point? > > >>Forth, do you know more than Professor Hyatt? Are you a programmer? Better yet >>are you a GM?? > > > >Depends on what your referring to, I know alot more than Professor Hyatt in >Certain Areas, as far as Computer Chess and the Strength of Programs it is an >area that all of us are guessing at, but the evidence is pointing to the fact >that computers are GM's, if Dr. Hyatt was as Smart as you think, he would >believe the evidence that is before his eyes, instead of being an Arrogant Son >of a Biscuit eater, for him it's more important not to be wrong, then to admit >the truth. I don't respect people with this type of EGO. by the way I don't have >to be a programmer to be right in what I am saying, all I have to do is look at >the Evidence and ACCEPT IT. By the way, there are many programmers here who >believe Hyatt is full of S--t. Can you name one? You're offending programmers with that statement (at least, I feel offended), so you'd better apologize. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.