Author: Mark Young
Date: 21:28:03 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 17:51:56, Andrew Williams wrote:
>On July 16, 2001 at 15:57:01, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On July 16, 2001 at 13:46:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>
>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:48:42, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:19:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[Event "Dortmund"]
>>>>>[Site "Dortmund, Germany"]
>>>>>[Date "2001.07.16"]
>>>>>[Round "5"]
>>>>>[White "Huebner(GER)"]
>>>>>[Black "DeepFritz(C)"]
>>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>>[WhiteElo "2612"]
>>>>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: closed (10...c5)"]
>>>>>[ECO "C96"]
>>>>>[NIC "RL.23"]
>>>>>[Time "07:28:12"]
>>>>>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>>>>>
>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8.
>>>>>c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Nxd4 Bb7 14. Nf5
>>>>>Rc8 15. Bf4 Nc4 16. b3 Ne5 17. Nd2 Re8 18. Rc1 Bf8 19. Bb1 Rxc1 20. Qxc1 b4
>>>>>21. Qd1 d5 22. Nf1 Ng6 23. Bg5 h6 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. exd5 Rxe1 26. Qxe1 Bxd5
>>>>>27. Qd2 Be6 28. Nd4 Bd7 29. Be4 Nf4 30. Ne2 Nxe2+ 31. Qxe2 Bc5 32. Ne3 Qa1+
>>>>>33. Qd1 Qxd1+ 34. Nxd1 f5 35. Bd3 Bc8 36. Nb2 Kf7 37. Bc4+ Kf6 38. Nd3 Bd6
>>>>>39. f4 Bb7 40. g3 a5 41. Kf2 g5 42. h4 Be4 43. hxg5+ hxg5 44. Bb5 gxf4 45.
>>>>>gxf4 Bxd3 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2
>>>>
>>>>GM Hübner was against the ropes most of the game, and also under time pressure.
>>>>But Fritz could not resist the temptation to win a pawn, and entered an
>>>>opposite-coloured bishop ending. The game was immediately agreed drawn, I guess
>>>>the operator of Fritz realized what was going on and did not want to waste his
>>>>time.
>>>>Does anybody know the time control? From watching the game live, it is
>>>>reasonable to assume that the first time control is 40 moves in two hours, but
>>>>then what?
>>>>José.
>>>
>>>Congratulation to Dr. Huebner, he defended well again in this second game.
>>>The open question is how many games will he endure against the silicon monster ?
>>>
>>>Regards.
>>
>>I’m confused, the way everyone is talking, it sounds like DeepFritz is the
>>favorite to win this match. I hear how nice the 2600+ Grandmaster played and
>>defended against the computer.
>>
>
>Your trolling is becoming somewhat tiresome. You said "the way everyone is
>talking", when the only opinion you are working from is from Otello Gnaramori.
Really, the only opinion I am working from is Otello Gnaramori, Lets check the
facts with some "quotes"
This was all in reply to your post.
Title of thread: Deep Fritz 1/2-1/2 Huebner - Huebner strong!
"Strong played from Dr. Huebner! My congratulation to Dr. Huebner.
Now are yet 5 games to play, and GM Dr. Huebner has 3x white."
Eduard
"Yes indeed! Besides the big three (and maybe RJF) the only other super solid
players that I would see play computers are Hübner, Andersson and Karpov"
Dan Andersson
"Who are the big three?
Do you speak of Anand, Kasparov and Kramnik, or some other combination?"
Dann Corbit
"Yes, Anand would be nice for his hard to kill defensive skills. The other two
for their tactical ability. And RJF was the most pragmatic player ever."
Dan Andersson
>
>This seems to be about as convincing as your "programs are only rated 2100"
>straw man.
>
>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.