Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: does chessbase care about wb engines

Author: CLiebert

Date: 01:08:21 07/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 21, 2001 at 19:08:09, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On July 21, 2001 at 07:27:10, CLiebert wrote:
>
>>On July 20, 2001 at 16:47:29, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On July 20, 2001 at 04:13:44, CLiebert wrote:
>>>[snip]
>>>>OK I understand your point. But would you admitt that thinking like this would
>>>>mean that every development in computerchess-engines could be canceled, because
>>>>nobody asks for the progress of a new tiger, shredder oder fritz?!
>>>
>>>No.  People will still buy the top SSDF program which is 2 ELO better than its
>>>opponent with an error bar of +/-35 ELO without even looking at the features.
>>>So then they can say they have the "strongest" program.  And nobody is going to
>>>sit still.  If development on the professional engines stopped, eventually the
>>>amateurs would pass them.  I think there will always be a gap between the
>>>professional engines and the amateur engines for 3 reasons:
>>>1.  The professionals get to spend a lot more time developing
>>>2.  The data in the form of opening books will always be better because amateurs
>>>are not capable of assembling a professional quality opening book
>>>3.  Most amateur innovations are openly discussed and most profesional
>>>innovations are kept secret.
>>
>>
>>Some profis are only profis via definition, like Ban or Uniacke f. ex.!
>>
>>"I think there will always be a gap between the professional engines and the
>>amateur engines..."
>>
>>That´s what I have written before, I agree! There is still a difference for
>>different reasons. One might be forgotten always:
>>may be they are still better - working harder is one point, having more talent
>>another, isn´t it ... ?!
>
>I really doubt that every single pro is more talented that every single of the
>best amateurs programmers. One may be more, another could be less, who knows.
>In fact, it is really difficult to prove when one group invest one order of
>magnitude more effort and resources than the other.
>
>Regards,
>Miguel

I didn´t say "every" as I never would say never. But talent and new ideas are
very very important to improve engines over a certain point (f.ex. tiger) and
for entering the top 5. Most of the amateurs are staying around the
"crafty-line" or lower. This might be the level you can reach today without
having special ideas but if you program in a very good, solid and a traditional
way. May be, who knows...

Regards
Christian





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.