Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 07:38:32 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 06:44:06, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On July 21, 2001 at 11:48:20, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On July 21, 2001 at 11:15:10, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On July 21, 2001 at 10:55:02, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >>> >>>>Well, these two players have drew the fifth game of the match. Everything will >>>>be decided in the last game tomorrow! >>>>José. >>>> >>>>P.S. I predict another draw in the last game (: >>> >>>Me too. Especialy since Huebner is known to be something like a "draw-king" >>>years before this match. Guess where he will present some analysis and opinions >>>and what he will say about Fritz... >> >>In case of another draw tomorrow, there will be another "big point" for the >>computer party, since Huebner isn't known only as "drawish" player but as an >>anti-computer specialist and a strong GM first of all. > >GM Hübner is not an anti-computer specialist, by any stretcht of the word. As >far as I know, he has not won any public game against a computer. From another >post of you I see that he has lost two games in the past, and now has drawn six >games against Fritz. >I consider Arnold Hasidovsky much more of an anti-comp specialist. >José. > You are right, he isn't an anticomp specialist in a general sense. What I meant was that he had the opportunity to prepare against the machine, discovering possibly weak points of it , and taking appropriate anti-comp strategies in that sense. I already told that but "repetita iuvant". BTW I am curios too like Mr. Faber about Dr.Huebner comments post-match. Regards. > >>That should mean that human and comps are in a good equilibrium, and IMHO taking >>in account recent argentinian results, the balance plate is starting to fall in >>the computer side. >> >>Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.