Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Fritz 0-1 GM Dreev

Author: Hristo

Date: 00:45:05 08/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2001 at 03:18:30, odell hall wrote:

>On August 01, 2001 at 23:39:29, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On August 01, 2001 at 17:29:54, Andrew Williams wrote:
>>
>>>The game went:
>>>
>>>[Event "ICS Rated standard match"]
>>>[Site "204.178.125.65"]
>>>[Date "2001.08.01"]
>>>[Round "-"]
>>>[White "tartaruga"]
>>>[Black "Dreev"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>[WhiteElo "2568"]
>>>[BlackElo "2835"]
>>>[TimeControl "7200+10"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bc4 e6 7. Be3 Be7
>>>8. f4 O-O 9. Qf3 Nxd4 10. Bxd4 Qa5 11. O-O e5 12. Be3 exf4 13. Qxf4 Be6 14.
>>>Nd5 Bxd5 15. exd5 Rae8 16. b4 Qc7 17. Bd3 Nd7 18. Bd4 Ne5 19. Qg3 g6 20.
>>>Bb5 Rc8 21. c3 f5 22. a4 Kh8 23. a5 a6 24. Be2 Bf6 25. Qf4 Qg7 26. Rad1 Nf7
>>>27. b5 axb5 28. Bxb5 Be5 29. Qd2 Rc7 30. Rde1 Rfc8 31. Re2 Qf6 32. Qb2 Kg7
>>>33. Bxe5 Nxe5 34. c4 Re7 35. Kh1 Rcc7 36. Rfe1 f4 37. Re4 g5 38. Qd4 Rc5
>>>39. Qf2 Rc8 40. Qd2 Rcc7 41. Qe2 Ng6 42. Rf1 Rxe4 43. Qxe4 Re7 44. Qf3 Qb2
>>>45. Rg1 Qd2 46. Qg4 Kf6 47. h3 Qxa5 48. Qc8 Re1 49. Kh2 Rxg1 50. Qe6+ Kg7
>>>51. Kxg1 Qa1+ 52. Kh2 Qe5 53. Qd7+ Kh6 54. Kh1 Qe1+ 55. Kh2 Qg3+ 56. Kh1 f3
>>>57. gxf3 Qe1+ 58. Kh2 Qf2+ 59. Kh1 Qxf3+ 60. Kh2 Qe2+ 61. Kg1 Qe1+ 62. Kh2
>>>Qe2+ 63. Kg1 Nf4 64. Qg4 Qe1+ 65. Kh2 Qf2+ 66. Kh1 b6 67. h4 Qxh4+ 68.
>>>Qxh4+ gxh4 69. Kg1 Kg5 70. Kf2 Kf5 71. Kf3 Ke5 72. Kg4 h3 73. Kg3 Kd4 74.
>>>Kh2 Nd3 75. Kxh3 Ne5 76. Kh4 Nxc4
>>>{tartaruga resigns} 0-1
>>>
>>>
>>>Deep Fritz was on a Dual 1GHz PIII
>>>
>>>Andrew
>>
>>
>>Maybe Frans will get off that marketing hype crap and stop with the
>>"deep fritz is as good or better than Deep Blue and is ready for Kramnik"
>>junk now.
>
>
>Dr. Hyatt
>
> You are one of the first people who say , one game means nothing, Now because
>of one victory by dreev a 2690 grandmaster, all of a sudden it's all hype, you
>are a hypocrite of the first order.

Odell,
why do you say this? If you are correct and understand the other party well, at
all times, then there is nothing you can do about it. You can't change people
just because you call them names. If you are wrong, because even of simple
misunderstanding, then your are going to offend the other person, perhaps make
him mad.
So Odell,
what is the point? Just a flame war?! ;-) at all cost ...

note that I disagree with Dr. Hyatt too.


cheers.
hristo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.