Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Vishy Anand about Deep Fritz vs. Kramnik

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:46:06 08/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 13, 2001 at 13:47:16, Roy Eassa wrote:

>On August 13, 2001 at 13:18:04, Kevin Stafford wrote:
>
>>winning doesn't really matter, and perhaps may hurt potential sales. This may be
>>twisted logic, but here's why I think this: the media is jumping on this match
>>as a rematch between man and machine. If machine beats man, no one is shocked,
>>because its the general publics viewpoint that the best chessplayer is already a
>>machine, so this isn't really news. Man beats machine on the other hand, and you
>>have an epic comeback story to put on the news, one that restores faith in our
>>dominance over our creations, blah blah blah. Fritz beating Kramnik gets a
>>byline on the backpage. Kramnik beating Fritz is front page news, once the media
>>puts their spin on it. Front page news = more copies of fritz 7 sold =
>>chessbases ultimate goal.
>>
>>Of course the opposite side of this is that if they win they can put a big label
>>on the box saying so, which is great advertising in itself, so I could be
>>totally off base. Something to ponder at least.
>>
>
>You are not totally off base.  A big label on the box will sell a small number
>(call it x) of additional copies to a mostly-existing audience (where does the
>public see the box?).  The bigger news story you hypothesize from Fritz's losing
>will get the attention of a much larger potential audience.  Even if only a
>small percentage of these "new people" buy, it will result in selling y
>additional copies, where it is reasonable to expect that y is significantly
>greater than x.

Don't forget the 'creative spin' that marketing people sometimes use.
For instance, if a chess match went like this:

Human +9 =1 -1
Computer +1 =1 -9

They could say:
"In an international competition between the world champion and best chess
player of all time, our computer not only managed to tie but even to defeat
him!"

It's not a lie.  Just a misrepresentation of the facts.  The computer did win
one game and draw one game.  It also happened to lose 9 of them.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.