Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:48:11 05/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 1998 at 02:55:05, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Vincent Diepeveen on May 10, 1998 at 18:51:35: > >>Preprocessor programs generally cannot see the consequences of >>positions that change, and in these positions the pawnstructure is >>complex no doubt, which demands an evaluation at the leaves >>rather than in the root. > >>Rebel is outdated in this respect, although rebels preprocessor >>is very good, no doubt. > >Rebel's preprocessor is about 1% of its total knowledge. I told you >this several times. In general I am against preprocessing but in >several cases you can solve complex things in a most convenient way >using preprocessing. Well you're the programmer so you know the best what is in Rebel if you say so we believe this. This means that rebel is simply lacking a lot of stuff like mobility, and that you didn't work too hard on pawn structure. Why does Rebel show so much differences in evaluation AFTER you make some pawn moves in for example game II DB-Kasparov? >>The search depths of nowadays however clearly demand a >>different way to evaluate a position. > >>Note that Rebel tournament book usually does a good job >>in avoiding complex pawn structures. > >Also not true. Could you first consult Jeroen before answerring this? >- Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.