Author: Don Dailey
Date: 10:26:26 05/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 1998 at 03:08:51, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On May 12, 1998 at 16:54:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>doesn't work like that. I can pick a series of games from the week >>before where I won *7* and lost *0*. so you can't cherry-pick one good >>result. >> >>Here's how things *really* look, and I am excluding results from the >>last >>4 weeks where I had the SMP computer... This is strictly crafty vs DiepX >>and crafty vs DoctorWho... on equal hardware: >> >>Crafty has won 82 against diepX, lost 29, and drawn 24. *total* >>against handle "DiepX" > >I think this is a logical response to Vincent. > >I think it is a mistake to judge a version based upon how it does in one >short match, especially when the best you could do versus the best he >could do has had a different result typically. > >3.5 out of 4.0 is a good result for him, but let's see how it holds up. >I don't think this one result gives him license to trash your search. > >Let's see if he can beat you 35 out of 40. > >bruce Before the 1993 ICCA tournament me and Larry put our last tweaks in Socrates, played 2 test games with Genius on equal hardware and won both games!!! Wow, that's 100% score. We can beat Genius EVERY time! We went on to actually win this tournament, but subsequent testing showed we were weaker than the Genius we tested against. - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.