Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Wanted: Deep Blue vs. today's top programs recap

Author: pavel

Date: 12:39:55 08/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2001 at 05:38:51, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 26, 2001 at 05:16:15, Mike S. wrote:
>
>>On August 25, 2001 at 21:42:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>let's look to facts, ignoring it played kasparov
>>>  - deep blue searched between 11 and 13 ply, most likely 12 ply
>>
>>I have read that it searched deeper (the SP/2 8...9 plies during the middlegame,
>>and the chess hardware 5...7 ply additionally each). This would mean, it should
>>have searched 13 ply minimum, up to 16.
>>
>>I've seen an example of the log files which was published, where DB searched 17
>>plies for the move 35.Bxd6 in game two of the Kasparov match (full board, only 2
>>minor pieces were exchanged in that position).
>>
>>I doubt 12 or 13 ply, admitting I haven't looked into the log files (yet).
>>
>>Regards,
>>M.Scheidl
>
>people do not agree about the meaning of the logfiles and vincent believes that
>11(6) means 11 plies and not 17 plies.
>
>IBM claims that 11(6) means 17 plies but vincent does not believe them.
>
>If 11(6) means 17 plies then the impression that I got based on analysis of the
>logfiles is that other programs have better extensions than Deep blue because I
>saw cases when they can see the same start of the main line at smaller depthes.
>
>If people are interested in comparing the analysis of Deeper blue with the
>analysis of Deep Fritz or Junior7 or Crafty18.10 then I have no problem to help
>but I am not going to do alone all this project of giving top program some hours
>for every position that Deeper blue pondered.
>
>I think that complete analysis of these positions by other programs may give
>better information and we can see in cases that both saw the same line if the
>commercial programs are faster or Deeper blue is faster.
>
>It seems that nobody or almost nobody except me is interested in the analysis of
>the positions from these games for hours so I do not do it because if I do it
>alone or almost alone it is going to take too much time.
>
>If I spend 5 hours per position and use my computer 20 hours per week for Deeper
>blue-kasparov games then I need years to finish the job and I am not interested
>so much in the problem in order to give my programs more than 20 hours per week
>or to wait years for all the relevant information.
>
>Uri



I am interested to contribute,
just send me an email to pmahamood@aol.com and let me know how I can help you.


pavs...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.