Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:34:56 08/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2001 at 18:40:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On August 26, 2001 at 18:14:54, Peter Kappler wrote: > >> >>> >>>All that Hsu have to do is convert his Deeper Blue into todays hardware >>>standards and make it commercial, but I still doubt that his 1997 programming >>>chess knowledge will be better than the current one, unless Hsu has been >keeping up with the latest chess programming innovations. >>> >> >>Apparently he had a plan for putting 8 of the DB chess processors onto a PCI >>card, but was only interested in doing it if he could get Kasparov to agree to a >>match. Unfortunately, it didn't work out. >> >>Maybe this is what you were thinking of when you said DB could be ported to the >>PC. But even this would be a far cry from the "real" DB. >> >>-Peter > >Yes Peter, now we are both in the same frame of mind, but I was never comparing >Deeper Blue Hardware analystical power, since even Fritz 5 using this multi >parallel Super Computer would not be a match against todays Deep Fritz. > >Pichard. I am not sure about it. Fritz5 may have some bug at long time control(it was not tested at these conditions) Fritz5 also may have a bad branching factor relative to Deep Fritz at long time control. It is possible that Fritz5 suffers from diminishing returns at long time control for other reasons. I do not assume as obvious that Fritz5(200M nodes per seconds) is better than Deep Fritz(2M nodes per second) The only way to know is by testing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.