Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:32:05 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 09:43:14, Alberto Rezza wrote: >On August 28, 2001 at 00:20:55, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>You've got to be KIDDING me. Do you honestly think I'm posting because I think >>my stupid micro program is better than DB?? And how do you figure that I'm >>finding fault with DB > >Your SMP ( = Stupid Micro Program :^) ) might well be better than DB. One can't >equate speed with quality, as Bob does. You could take, say, MacHack (was that >the name?), or an even older program, and implement it in hardware at 10G n/s. >It would beat Junior and the rest, but I would hardly say it is a better program >than Junior. I doubt if a really stupid program can beat Junior and the rest even at 10G n/s I believe that a program with the exact evaluation function as tscp is going to lose against Junior even if the speed is 10G n/s and you use good search algorithms(I assume 10G means 10^13) There is a number that is big enough but I do not believe in 10^13 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.