Author: K. Burcham
Date: 05:22:23 09/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
amazing game. i always look for moves that you played for the computer,
to get the results you want.
in this game, deep fritz chooses all the program moves that you list here.
in your games that you sacrifice material for position, and your "every move
advance toward king" methods, this makes your games look very easy for
a human. and this makes these games look like you are playing an
easy opponent.
it seems that if these (all) programs are this vunerable to kingside
attacks, then it would also seem that huebner (spelling?) could
have used these methods in his comp games. and it would also seem
that kramnik could use these methods in his upcoming match.
and if kasparov is so good, and the king, and he used a comp for studies,
then why didnt he use these methods with deep? are you going to
say that deep would not choose these moves. are you going to
say that deep would not fall for ...h5, and would develop
its own attack.
also eduard, will these programs repeat these games after the program loses
in this type of game.
have you ever tried to play one of these games with these type of results,
and then play two or three more with almost the same moves. to see
if you can win with almost the same board positions. in other words
it would be very interesting to analyse three games where you
play deep fritz, and win with early kingside attack. with same
opening using ...h5. it would be amazing to see that the
same program can be lost in these similiar positions using
...h5 three games in a row.
kburcham
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.