Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:18:55 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 02:20:34, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On September 08, 2001 at 00:37:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 07, 2001 at 23:10:53, Peter McKenzie wrote: >> >>>On September 07, 2001 at 22:08:27, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>I don't have his position but I have another 'quadrat position' like the Fine 70 >>>>with a not so obvious first move, well it is Kb1 but that must be a coincidence >>>>:) >>>> >>>>[D]>>White wins. 1.Kb1! >>> >>>Are you sure? >>>I ran it through LambChop, and the prefered move was switching between Kb1 and >>>Kc2 with a score of around 0.4 for each move. Then at depth 25 I got a fail >>>high on Kc2, returning a score of 1.6. >>> >>>As I write, the same score has popped up for Kc2 at depth 26 too... >>> >>>Peter >>> >>>> >>>>Odd Gunnar >> >> >>I ran this thru crafty, and got early draw scores, followed by several fail >>highs on Kb1. >> >>By depth=25 my score was +1, by 27 it was +1.75. and by depth 30 it was 3.69... >> >>Bob >> >> 30-> 48.87 3.69 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc1 Ka8 3. Kd1 Kb8 4. >> Ke1 Kb7 5. Ke2 Kc8 6. Kd3 Kd7 7. Kc4 >> Kd8 8. Kxb4 Ke7 9. Ka5 Kf8 10. Ka6 >> Ke7 11. Kb7 Kd7 12. b4 Kd8 13. Kxc6 >> Kc8 14. d5 exd5 15. Kxd5 Kd7 16. b5 >> >>Kb1 seems to be the right move... > >Maybe, or maybe they are both strong? >How about playing Kc2 and letting crafty do a long search? > >cheers, >Peter I let it run past 35 plies after playing Kc2, and the score stuck at about +1 forever. Kb1 had much larger scores at deeper depths.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.