Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:47:45 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 11:40:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 09, 2001 at 11:33:37, Günther Simon wrote: > >>>>Please take a look again at the former post of K.Burcham and you >>>>would see that it took Shredder 5 (in the position when F6 grabbed >>>>at g4) 41! minutes on a 1Gig Cpu to avoid it here. >>> >>>The point is about stronger programs like Deep Fritz and not about shredder5. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>huh? Shredder won recently the SingleCPU WM... >> >>Günther > > >It is totally unimportant. >The version of shredder that was used was not shredder5. >Shredder5 is even not the latest commercial version > >Deep Fritz is the best commercial program and not shredder. >Deep Fritz also does not like 8.h3 on p800 > >[D]r2qkb1r/pp2pp2/2n3pn/1B5p/6b1/2N2N2/PPPP1PPP/R1BQ1RK1 w kq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Deep Fritz: > >8.Bxc6+ bxc6 > ± (1.22) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >8.d3! > +- (1.75) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >8.d3 Bg7 > +- (1.47) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >8.d4! > +- (1.53) Depth: 2/13 00:00:00 >8.h3! > +- (1.56) Depth: 2/13 00:00:00 >8.h3! Bf5 > +- (1.63) Depth: 2/13 00:00:00 >8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 Qd6 > +- (1.78) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >8.h3 Bf5 9.d3 Bg7 > +- (1.59) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >8.d4! > +- (1.63) Depth: 4/20 00:00:00 5kN >8.d4! a6 > +- (1.66) Depth: 4/20 00:00:00 9kN >8.d4 a6 9.Ba4 Bg7 10.Bf4 > +- (1.56) Depth: 5/20 00:00:00 21kN >8.h3! > +- (1.59) Depth: 5/20 00:00:00 23kN >8.h3! Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.Bf4 > +- (1.72) Depth: 5/20 00:00:00 26kN >8.h3 Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.d5 Bxc3 11.bxc3 > +- (1.66) Depth: 6/19 00:00:00 36kN >8.h3 Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.Bf4 Nf5 11.d5 > +- (1.66) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 72kN >8.h3 Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.d5 Nb4 11.Bc4 0-0 > +- (1.59) Depth: 8/24 00:00:00 206kN >8.d4! > +- (1.63) Depth: 8/24 00:00:00 488kN >8.d4! a6 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3 Rc8 12.Bxh6 > +- (1.66) Depth: 8/25 00:00:01 628kN >8.d4 a6 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.h3 Bf5 11.Ne5 Rc8 > +- (1.56) Depth: 9/30 00:00:02 1401kN >8.h3! > +- (1.59) Depth: 9/30 00:00:02 1500kN >8.h3! Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.Bf4 Nf5 11.Nd5 0-0 12.c3 > +- (1.69) Depth: 9/30 00:00:02 1626kN >8.h3 Bd7 9.d4 Bg7 10.Bf4 Nf5 11.Bxc6 Bxc6 12.d5 Bd7 13.Re1 > +- (1.59) Depth: 10/30 00:00:03 2178kN >8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 Rc8 10.Ne4 a6 11.Re1 Bg7 12.Nf6+ Kf8 13.Bxc6 bxc6 > ± (1.38) Depth: 11/30 00:00:10 6301kN >8.d4! > +- (1.41) Depth: 11/31 00:00:22 14206kN >8.d4! a6 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3 Rc8 > +- (1.50) Depth: 11/33 00:00:27 17762kN >8.d4 a6 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3 Rc8 12.Rd1 Nf5 13.d5 cxd5 > +- (1.53) Depth: 12/33 00:00:55 35629kN >8.d4 a6 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3 Qd7 12.Bxh6 Rxh6 13.Rfd1 Rb8 > +- (1.47) Depth: 13/36 00:02:05 74546kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 09.09.2001) Sorry Deep Fritz later considers 8.h3 as the best move so I cannot say that it avoid 8.h3 but at least it avoids 9.hxg4 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.