Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:24:09 09/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2001 at 04:19:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 10, 2001 at 01:47:23, Saran Maitreiwech wrote: > >>>that will be used for the match. I doubt he will tell the DF guys what >>>openings _he_ intends on playing, and what strategy _he_ is going to follow. >> >>What I think is this. If the rule says Kramnik can take a break, how can we know >>that he doesn't take a break with his copy of DF? >> >>When I read the answer from ChessBase to KasparovChess, I thought I may be >>something stupid to think that giving away a copy is ridiculous. But when you >>convince me that it is ridiculous, then I think I'm not stupid much. Thank you. > >The rules say simply that Kramnik wins because the organizers think that if >there is even 0.1% chance that kramnik does not win the match it is not >interesting. > >This is the only reason that I can find for all these strange rules that say >even that Deep Fritz's book cannot be changed between games by more than 10 >plies. > >It is totally unimportant if kramnik can use Deep Fritz after 60 moves because I >predict that kramnik is going to win most of the games in less than 60 moves > >We can probably learn nothing from the match unless chessbase decided to use >some trick (for example to let Deep Fritz to play in a different way only in the >dates of the match). > >Uri learn nothing is meant about the level of Deep Fritz We can learn about weaknesses of Deep Fritz from the match but it means nothing about the level of it if kramnik does not play normal chess opening and tries to get the program out of book in the first moves by 1.e4 h5 lines. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.