Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:36:21 09/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2001 at 03:47:40, Uri Blass wrote: >If shredder5.32 is a clearly better engine than shredder2 than >you could use for shredder5.32 the same opening book of shredder2 >and start the matches with even better results than Shredder2 so >the excuse of a bad opening book does not seem to be convincing. If I remember correctly, Sandro wrote that he wasn't responsible for the Shredder 5.32 book. The opening book was created by Chessbase and I haven't heard anyone praise it yet. And since the SSDF test the default commercial edition, bookswapping at random isn't allowed. Depsite of that, the quoted paragraph is pure nonsense. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.