Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 18:00:44 09/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2001 at 10:41:05, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 13, 2001 at 08:37:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 12, 2001 at 19:49:32, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On September 12, 2001 at 19:27:18, ERIQ wrote: >>> >>>>I generally run linux so would love to have dual system but am not sure which >>>>would run crafty faster the single athlon or dual pIII's. but I am sure they are >>>>both faster than what I have now a 433 cel. :( >>>> >>>>(must upgrade fast) >>>> >>>>Let me also say that I would like something under $2,000 us. and would not mind >>>>building it myself. >>>> >>>>I would be using it for general stuff, trying to write programs in C,C++, and of >>>>course chess mostly my database programs and playing programs Yace,CT,Crafty >>>>etc. >>>> >>>>main reason for upgrade is any time you are compiling something and try to do >>>>something else, it gets sooooo slooooow. >>>> >>>> sign, >>>> Eriq >>> >>>I have owned BOTH machines, and the 2x1000mhz will be faster. (On SMP >>>applications.) >>> >>> >>>Slate >> >>What's that for nonsense? >> >>I own both a P3 dual and a dual 1.2MP and the dual 1.2MP blows away >>anything i had before. >> >>a) the bandwidth from DDR ram is 2 times that of sdram >>b) the processor is nearly 2 times faster. > >I have owned a 2x1000mhz before. And I (essentially) own a single 1.4Ghz now. >He was NOT talking about dual 1.4's - just a single. > >The bench on Crafty with 1 AMD 1.4Ghz is about 800k nps. The dual 1000mhz was >1.1M. > >Like I said, on SMP applications, the 2x1000mhz will be faster. oh sorry i missed the single versus dual. Well there is also a dual AMD possibility and it sure is faster than a single AMD :) > >Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.