Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:20:40 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2001 at 06:20:38, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 16, 2001 at 05:40:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 15, 2001 at 18:37:06, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On September 15, 2001 at 17:12:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>[D]8/p4bpk/7p/3rq3/3Npp2/PPQ3P1/3R1PKP/8 w - - 3 32 >>> >>>Deep Fritz fails low on gxf4 in :54 seconds, but has a hard time replacing it. >>> >>>Deep Fritz T29c - W,S >>>8/p4bpk/7p/3rq3/3Npp2/PPQ3P1/3R1PKP/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Deep Fritz T29c: >>> >>>1.gxf4 >>> ³ (-0.50) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.Kg1 fxg3 >>> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 f3+ >>> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>>1.Rd1 Qh5 2.Qe1 f3+ 3.Kg1 >>> ³ (-0.41) Depth: 3/13 00:00:00 3kN >>>1.h3! >>> ³ (-0.37) Depth: 3/15 00:00:00 4kN >>>1.h3! f3+ >>> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 3/15 00:00:00 5kN >>>1.gxf4! >>> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 3/16 00:00:00 6kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 >>> = (-0.25) Depth: 4/14 00:00:00 7kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Kg1 >>> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 5/15 00:00:00 20kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Kg1 a6 >>> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 6/17 00:00:00 41kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Qe3 Qg6+ 5.Qg3 Qf6 >>> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 7/19 00:00:00 77kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bd5 >>> ³ (-0.37) Depth: 8/22 00:00:00 163kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bd5 6.Rf2 >>> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 9/21 00:00:00 435kN >>>1.gxf4-- >>> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 10/28 00:00:00 829kN >>>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Re5 6.Qf3 Be4 >>> µ (-0.91) Depth: 10/28 00:00:01 1322kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Re5 6.Qf3 Be4 >>> µ (-0.78) Depth: 11/28 00:00:10 10103kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Rg1+ 6.Ke2 Qh5+ >>> µ (-0.87) Depth: 12/30 00:00:15 14926kN >>>1.gxf4-- >>> µ (-1.19) Depth: 13/32 00:00:36 35237kN >>>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Qf4 6.Nxf3 Bd5 >>> -+ (-1.69) Depth: 13/34 00:00:54 51719kN >>>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Bd5 6.Rd1 Kg6 >>> -+ (-1.78) Depth: 14/34 00:03:06 176328kN >>>1.gxf4-- >>> -+ (-2.09) Depth: 15/37 00:06:25 368131kN >>>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Kh1 Rg5 3.f3 Bh5 4.Rg2 exf3 5.Rxg5 f2 6.Qd3+ g6 >>> -+ (-3.03) Depth: 15/38 00:10:17 576496kN >>> >>>(W, 15.08.2001) >> >>For comparison analysis of Deep Fritz on p800(64 Mbytes hash) >>Deep Fritz searched for more than 10 hours at depth 17 but >>it still looks at f3. >> >>Note that Deep fritz finds fail low for gxf4 in less than 10 minutes >>and it probably means that with the best hardware Deep Fritz can >>find f3 at tournament time control. >> >>New position >>8/p4bpk/7p/3rq3/3Npp2/PPQ3P1/3R1PKP/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Deep Fritz: >> >>1.gxf4-- >> ³ (-0.50) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>1.gxf4-- >> ³ (-0.50) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>1.h3! >> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 >>1.h3! f3+ 2.Kg1 >> = (-0.25) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 >>1.Kg1! >> = (-0.19) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 >>1.Kg1! fxg3 >> = (0.00) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 >>1.Kg1 e3 >> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>1.Rd1! >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>1.Rd1! f3+ >> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >>1.Rd1 Qh5 2.Qe1 f3+ 3.Kg1 >> ³ (-0.41) Depth: 3/13 00:00:00 3kN >>1.h3! >> ³ (-0.37) Depth: 3/15 00:00:00 4kN >>1.h3! f3+ >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 3/15 00:00:00 5kN >>1.gxf4! >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 3/16 00:00:00 6kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 >> = (-0.25) Depth: 4/14 00:00:00 7kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Kg1 >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 5/15 00:00:00 20kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Kg1 a6 >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 6/17 00:00:00 40kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Qg4+ 3.Qg3 Qh5 4.Qe3 Qg6+ 5.Qg3 Qf6 >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 7/19 00:00:00 83kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bd5 >> ³ (-0.37) Depth: 8/23 00:00:00 152kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bd5 6.Rf2 >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 9/25 00:00:00 417kN >>1.gxf4-- >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 10/28 00:00:01 801kN >>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Re5 6.Qf3 Be4 >> µ (-0.91) Depth: 10/28 00:00:01 1262kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Re5 6.Qf3 Be4 >> µ (-0.78) Depth: 11/30 00:00:13 9723kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kf1 Qxh2 4.Qxe4+ Bg6 5.Qe3 Rg1+ 6.Ke2 Qh5+ >> µ (-0.87) Depth: 12/30 00:00:20 14667kN >>1.gxf4-- >> µ (-1.19) Depth: 13/32 00:00:47 33715kN >>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Qf4 6.Nxf3 Bd5 >> -+ (-1.69) Depth: 13/36 00:01:15 52680kN >>1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Bd5 6.Rd1 Kg6 >> -+ (-1.78) Depth: 14/35 00:04:39 199152kN >>1.gxf4-- >> -+ (-2.09) Depth: 15/37 00:09:43 422090kN >>1.gxf4-- Qxf4 2.Kh1 Rg5 3.f3 Bh5 4.Rd1 Rd5 5.Re1 e3 6.Qc2+ Bg6 >> -+ (-2.78) Depth: 15/40 00:14:51 635762kN >>1.f3! >> -+ (-2.75) Depth: 15/40 00:32:40 1427443kN >>1.f3! Bh5 2.g4 e3 3.Rd1 Bf7 4.b4 e2 5.Re1 Rxd4 >> -+ (-2.66) Depth: 15/40 00:42:14 1841019kN >>1.f3 Bh5 2.g4 e3 3.Rd1 Bf7 4.b4 e2 5.Re1 Rxd4 6.Qc2+ >> -+ (-2.66) Depth: 16/42 00:59:57 2619083kN >>1.f3-- >> -+ (-2.97) Depth: 17/42 01:45:08 4599019kN >> >>(Blass, Tel-aviv 16.09.2001) >> >>Uri > >Look at the eval at the top. That's from Deep Fritz on my 2x1.4Ghz. > >In :54 seconds gxf4 fails low. And 10 minutes later, DF still hasn't found f3. > > > >Slate In this case your Deep Fritz is only slightly faster than PIII800 Your Deep Fritz on 2*1.4GH 1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Bd5 6.Rd1 Kg6 -+ (-1.78) Depth: 14/34 00:03:06 176328kN For comparison my Deep Fritz on pIII800 1.gxf4 Qxf4 2.Qe3 Rg5+ 3.Kh1 Qg4 4.f4 exf3 5.Qf2 Bd5 6.Rd1 Kg6 -+ (-1.78) Depth: 14/35 00:04:39 199152kN I do not understand the reason that your Deep Fritz cannot see more than 1000 Knodes per second because I expect Deep Fritz on 2*P1.4GH to be more than twice faster than pIII800. If deep Fritz used only one processor then it can explain the result. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.