Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:03:25 09/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2001 at 04:57:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 24, 2001 at 09:53:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 24, 2001 at 04:14:30, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On September 24, 2001 at 03:12:18, Tony Hedlund wrote: >>> >>>>On September 23, 2001 at 09:04:34, gregory j capace wrote: >>>> >>>>>If you have a faster processor, how much strength does this dd to the program ? >>>>>Does Fritz 6 run any stronger on my 566 mghz, versus a 450 nghz. , like the >>>>>rating says. How strong would it be on a 1.2 mghz. computer ? >>>> >>>>The step from 450 to 1200 MHz have gained 75 points so far. The step from 200 to >>>>450 gained 79 points. >>>> >>>>Tony >>> >>>Very interesting! Because 1200/450 = 2.67 and 450/200 = 2.25 there seems to be >>>diminishing return now?! Also I expect Fritz/Tiger to get 2725 rating in next >>>list. Hmm. What says Bob? >>> >>>Jouni >> >> >>First, Bob says 2725 has nothing to do with reality. > >2725 is a realistic ssdf rating. >If you are talking about games against humans then Tiger14 proved in the last >tournament that programs can get better than 2725 performance against humans >even with slower hardware than athlon1200. > >Uri Do you think that rating was a "spike" or an "average"? A long-term SSDF rating is not a "spike". A single event with a few rounds is a big one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.