Author: Dan Andersson
Date: 07:40:05 09/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
The money is in the lowest common denominator. And you can't get lower than one processor. You do not wave a magic wand to introduce SMP in a program. I would guess that a programmer that feels that his program has lots of improvement potential left in his program will feel less incentive to go SMP. The technical callenge might bring him over though. For example: Chess Tiger is a strong program that quite often plays horrible chess. I would think Christophe could easily squeeze a hundred to a hundred an fifty points from it by sheer knowledge and special case improvements.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.