Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is SMP not standard in chessprograms?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:16:29 09/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 25, 2001 at 14:06:14, Robert Hyatt wrote:
[snip]
>Hold on to your hat.  I'd expect that within the next _five_ years you will
>see single chips with two processors on them.  _that_ will change the way
>computing looks, once and for all...

Why stop at two?  If you put 64 CPU's on a single die, you can eliminate the
external switching circuitry, and greatly reduce the distance the signals must
travel.  At super high switching rates, a distance of 10cm is very significant.
(See Seymour Cray's "nanosecond of wire" for an illustration).

If we have trouble breaking (say) 10GHz, then just have 1024 CPU's at 10GHz
which would give a few terahertz [though not ten certainly].

I'll bet that would play a pretty snappy game of chess.  Might even make blitz
worth watching.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.