Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is SMP not standard in chessprograms?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 08:58:28 09/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2001 at 10:44:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On September 25, 2001 at 14:06:14, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On September 25, 2001 at 12:58:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On September 25, 2001 at 11:57:44, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>
>>>>Multi-cpu machines are very far from being the standard, and while they may
>>>>certainly be accessible (pricewise) in some countries nowadays, they are a very
>>>>very small minority. Most people think in terms of more MHz or GHz as opposed to
>>>>more cpus.
>>>>
>>>>                                          Albert
>>>
>>>I fully agree with this statement. There is no question of Multi-CPU machines
>>>being standard. Most people have PC with single CPU and I cannot imagine that
>>>this "standard" will change in the next few years.
>>>Regards
>>>Kurt
>>
>>
>>Hold on to your hat.  I'd expect that within the next _five_ years you will
>>see single chips with two processors on them.  _that_ will change the way
>>computing looks, once and for all...
>
>I don't doubt that that is the future, more processors onto a single
>chip, but i doubt whether in 5 years we will be able to affort such
>processor blocks.
>
>Let's bet on safe and say 50 years instead of 5 ...


You _already_ are getting three on a chip.  They just have a common program
counter.  Not much more space needed to add a program counter for each processor
and there you are...

new microprocessors are going to soon support threading anyway, internal to the
cpu, so that the cpu is executing multiple instruction streams all the time, to
overlap execution and memory access among other things.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.