Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 12:23:07 09/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2001 at 14:52:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 27, 2001 at 14:14:07, K. Burcham wrote: > >>takes shredder5 51 seconds to decide on Qh1. 1500 mhz amd >> >>Engine: Shredder 5 >>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >> >> >> 1.00 0:27 +9.84 1.dxe4 Rxd5 2.Rxg4 Bxc3 (5.687.141) 205.4 >> 1.00 0:51 +M1++ 1.Qh1+ (10.192.541) 199.6 >> 1.00 0:51 +M1 1.Qh1+ (10.192.542) 199.6 >>best move: Qa1-h1 time: 0:51.058 min n/s: 199.642 nodes: 10.192.560 >> >>kburcham > >New position >[D]8/8/pppppppK/NBBR1NRp/nbbrqnrP/PPPPPPPk/8/Q7 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Goliath Light 1.5: > >1.Qh1# > +- (#101) Depth: 4/31 00:00:15 2874kN >1.Qh1# > +- (#1) Depth: 4/31 00:00:15 2874kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 27.09.2001) > >I do not understand the first mate in 101 score > >Deep Fritz's analysis after more than 10 minutes of search > >New position >8/8/pppppppK/NBBR1NRp/nbbrqnrP/PPPPPPPk/8/Q7 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Deep Fritz: > >1.dxe4! > +- (1.56) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 > Is there a simple, understandable reason why several "strong" programs take so long here? (Deep Fritz not seeing the mate in 1 after 10 minutes is mind-boggling to me!)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.