Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:56:32 10/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2001 at 11:50:53, Gordon Rattray wrote:
>On October 01, 2001 at 09:36:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 01, 2001 at 09:32:20, Gordon Rattray wrote:
>>
>>>On September 30, 2001 at 17:36:18, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>When Junior 7 was released a few months back, most people who used it said that
>>>>it was too aggressive, and sometimes would give material for almost no reason.
>>>>
>>>>Those claims were hushed shortly after it won the WMCCC.
>>>>
>>>>This game was a game against Chess Tiger 14.0, played on playchess.com. It
>>>>shows a great example of Deep Junior giving away a piece, for little if any
>>>>compensation.
>>>>
>>>>I understand that in essence, it is trading a piece for 3 pawns. But any human
>>>>can look at the board and see, it's a trade that won't pay off in the end.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Chess Tiger 14.0 - Deep Junior 7 [D53]
>>>>
>>>> 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bxf6 Bxf6 7.Qd2 dxc4 {Last book
>>>>move for Deep Junior 7} 8.e4 c5 9.d5 exd5 10.e5 Nd7 11.exf6 Nxf6 12.Qe3+ Qe7
>>>>13.Qxe7+ Kxe7 14.0-0-0 Be6 15.Re1 Rhc8 16.g3 d4 17.Nb5 c3 18.bxc3 a6 19.Na3 Kf8
>>>>20.Bc4 Bh3 21.Ne5 Rc7 22.cxd4 cxd4 23.Kd2 Rac8 24.f3 Bf5 25.Rc1 Re8 26.Rhe1 Bh7
>>>>27.Bb3 Rxc1 28.Kxc1 b5 29.Nc2 Rc8 30.Kd2 Bxc2 31.Bxc2 Rc3 32.f4 a5 33.Bb3 g5
>>>>34.fxg5 hxg5 35.Bxf7 b4 36.Be6 a4 37.Ng6+ Ke8 38.Bb3+ Re3 39.Bxa4+ Kf7 40.Bc2
>>>>Rxe1 41.Kxe1 Ng4 42.h4 Kf6 43.h5 Ne3 44.Be4 Kg7 45.Ne5 g4 46.Nc6 Kh6 47.Nxb4 Nc4
>>>>48.Bg6 Kg5 49.Nc6 d3 50.Bxd3 Nb6 51.Bg6 Nd5 52.Ne5 Nb6 53.Kf2 Na4 54.Nxg4 Nc5
>>>>55.Kf3 Ne6 56.a4 Nd4+ 57.Ke4 Ne2 58.Be8 Nxg3+ 59.Kd5 1-0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The key position is this:
>>>>
>>>>[D]rnbqk2r/pp3pp1/5b1p/2ppP3/2p5/2N2N2/PP1Q1PPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - 0 10
>>>>
>>>>Here Deep Junior 7 plays 10...Nd7?? with this eval:
>>>>
>>>>W,S - Deep Junior 7
>>>>rnbqk2r/pp3pp1/5b1p/2ppP3/2p5/2N2N2/PP1Q1PPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>Analysis by Deep Junior 7:
>>>>
>>>>10...Bh4 11.Nxh4 Qxh4 12.Qxd5
>>>> ³ (-0.32) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>>>>10...Bg5 11.Nxg5 Qxg5 12.Qxd5
>>>> ³ (-0.33) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>>>>10...Bg5 11.Nxg5 Qxg5 12.Qxd5
>>>> ³ (-0.33) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>>>>10...Bg5 11.Qxd5 Qxd5 12.Nxd5 c3 13.Nxc3
>>>> = (-0.10) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN
>>>>10...Bg5 11.Nxg5
>>>> = (0.20) Depth: 9 00:00:00 94kN
>>>>10...Bg5 11.Qxd5 Nc6 12.Qxc4 Nd4 13.Rd1 Nxf3+ 14.gxf3 Qc7 15.f4 Bh4 16.Qa4+ Bd7
>>>>17.Bb5 Bxb5
>>>> = (0.23) Depth: 12 00:00:01 1645kN
>>>>10...Be7 11.Qxd5 Nc6 12.Bxc4 Qxd5 13.Nxd5 Bd8 14.0-0-0
>>>> = (0.21) Depth: 12 00:00:02 2218kN
>>>>10...Be7 11.Nxd5 b5 12.b3 Bg4 13.bxc4 Bxf3 14.gxf3 Nd7 15.Nxe7 Qxe7
>>>> = (0.18) Depth: 15 00:00:07 12048kN
>>>>10...Nd7 11.exf6 Nxf6 12.Qe3+ Qe7 13.Nb5 Be6 14.Qe5 Ng4 15.Qxg7 0-0-0 16.h3 Rhg8
>>>>17.Nxa7+ Kb8 18.Qc3 Nxf2 19.Kxf2 Kxa7
>>>> = (-0.01) Depth: 15 00:00:37 23534kN
>>>>10...Nd7 11.exf6 Nxf6 12.Qe3+ Qe7 13.Qxe7+ Kxe7 14.Ne5 Be6 15.0-0-0 d4 16.Na4
>>>>Ne4 17.Bxc4 Bxc4 18.Nxc4 Nxf2
>>>> = (-0.12) Depth: 18 00:03:58 448237kN
>>>>
>>>>(W, 30.09.2001)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Slate
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm currently running a match involving Junior 7 versus Chess Tiger 14.0. The
>>>time control is 40 moves in 10 hours, so it's very slow. The setup is two 1.1
>>>Ghz Athlons; J7 has 128 Mb hash; CT has 192 Mb hash.
>>>
>>>The first four games have seen a win for each program and two draws.
>>>Unfortunately, due to the very slow time control, I'm not going to be able to
>>>keep it going long enough to achieve any amount of games of statistical
>>>significance. However, I think it's still interesting to examine the nature of
>>>the losses.
>>>
>>>I'm currently posting from my work ( don't tell my boss ;-)), so I can't post
>>>the games right now, sorry. I'll post them at a later date if they are of
>>>interest.
>>>
>>>Gordon
>>
>>The claim of Mark young was that there is some evidence but not enough evidence
>>that Gambittiger and not Tiger14 is the best at long time control so it may be
>>interesting to compare results of tiger14 with results of Gambittiger2.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>Ok, I'll switch to Gambit Tiger. Unfortunately I'll only be able to play a
>small amount of games due to the time control, so the interest will lie in the
>games themselves and not so much the result.
>
>Should I use gambit book or the main (supplied) book?
>
>Should I keep all default setting or use, e.g., aggressive?
>
>Gordon
I do not know
I guess default setting and the main(supplied) book but it may be better to ask
Mark Young.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.