Author: stuart taylor
Date: 12:05:13 10/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2001 at 10:31:18, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On October 12, 2001 at 09:15:59, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Contd. from heading....with Gambit Tiger 2, Or Deep Fritz, or Fr. 7.0. Or a top >>program? >>Is there still any position in the world leading to a win, or even just an >>advantage > >>(recognizable to program!) > >Why do you use brackets ? That's in fact the challenge for programs. They should >be able to recognize an advantage. Otherwise they fail the test. You are astute. Often, brackets are the key to the main point. I was thinking about if the power of that set-up was enough, besides the "bug" like drawbacks. Then, firstly, will any human ever reach those "bugs"? and secondly (if so), they might be easy to rectify. S.Taylor > >> that not one of the top programs will be >>able to solve within 36 hours on an Athlon c, at 1.4 GHz. due to tactical >>inadequacies, or blind spots? >> >>If that is fulfilled, then there's not too much work left to solve chess, after >>refining position assesment a bit more etc. >> Only, possibly, a few very long term positional decisions, which maybe no >>human will ever get around to unleashing against it in a game. >> Of course, when speeded up with hardware etc. Or even correspondence, now. >>S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.