Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: If this Position is WCSAC 738 They Have The Wrong Position!

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 18:02:22 10/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 15, 2001 at 17:21:00, Roy Eassa wrote:

>On October 15, 2001 at 16:57:54, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>On October 15, 2001 at 12:22:58, leonid wrote:
>>
>>>On October 14, 2001 at 22:55:30, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>
>>>>I then gave it to my Mach III Master in Jan. 1990, it took it 2 min. 45 seconds
>>>>if I'm not mistaken.
>>>
>>>What is the Mach III Master? Some kind of stand alone electronic chess game?
>>>If it is what I think, the last time when I had something similar was around 13
>>>years ago. Then it was Radio Shack made gadget.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Better time than me!;-)
>>>
>>>Try to put from time to time here some position from real life, like the last
>>>forced mate. It is fun to solve them.
>>>
>>>Leonid.
>>>
>>>>Terry
>>
>>Yes it was a stand alone unit, made by Fidelity Electronics. Dan Spracklen was
>>the Key programmer.
>>
>>This was the last programme he made for Fidelity Electronics, the Mach IV Master
>>was the same programme just on faster hardware, a Motorola 68200 32bit at 20
>>Mgh. while the Mach III was running on a 68000 16bit at 16 Mgh., as Hegner &
>>Glasser (Mephisto) bought them out in the fall of '89.
>>Another thing many might not know was the Mach III programme was written in 8bit
>>code and adapted to 16:) Those were the days!
>>
>>I should look at some of my old games I use to play with this machine and my old
>>Novag Super Forte "C" running on a 6502 8bit at 6 Mgh. (Boy that's Slow!) and
>>see if I can dig up some old mating attacks, some which were long.
>>
>>I was better I think in those days!;-)
>>
>>Terry
>
>
>I also had the Mach III Master _and_ the Super Forte and played them against
>each other.  I sold the Mach III not that long ago.  I still have the Super
>Forte.  Another machine in the same category as both of these units as far as
>physical size, features, price, and rating was the Mephisto Mondial, which I
>also still have.  The three boxes were quite close in strength in my tests.
>
>Just think of the trouble we used to go through in those days to test these
>boxes with games against each other or with test suites!  And you'd have to
>write down the moves by hand (I did have [still do?] the move printer for the
>Novag).  Things sure have gotten a lot easier!

Very true! But I remeber when I first got my "box" and at the time really
thought what a little marvel it was:))

Actually I feel that's why I keep my unit boxed away. Memories!:o)

Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.