Author: blass uri
Date: 13:33:00 05/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1998 at 05:10:13, Amir Ban wrote: >[Event "Dov Porat Memorial"] >[Site "Givataim, Israel"] >[Date "25-May-98"] >[Round "4"] >[White "IM Alex Krayz"] >[Black "Junior 4.9"] >[Result "1-0"] >[ECO "?"] > >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. Bb3 d6 7. c3 h6 >8. Re1 {Black out of book} Na5 9. Bc2 c5 10. Nbd2 Be6 11. Nf1 Qc7 12. >Ng3 Rac8 13. h3 Rfd8 14. Qe2 a6 15. Nh2 c4 {A mistake. Junior >miscalculated 16.d4 exd4 17.cxd4 c3 to be good for black, but white can >play 18.Bd3 with advantage. b5 is correct} Fritz5 found b5 after 32 minutes and 43 seconds in my computer pentium200Mh when it used 99,968 Kbytes hash tables the depth is 14 brute force and 43 selective Junior4.6 could not find this move in one hour. 16. d4 exd4 17. cxd4 Nc6 18. >Nf3 d5 19. e5 Nd7 20. Nf5 Qb6 21. Nxe7 Nxe7 22. g4 Fritz5 found 22.g4 after less than 5 minutes (I do not remember the exact time) It evaluated the position as adventage for black and this prove that fritz5 is good at finding good positional moves when the king's opponent is in danger(even if it is bad at evaluating) I do not like the fact fritz5 is a good program but I cannot ignore facts. They do not deserve to be a good program because they want to be number 1 by unfair means. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.