Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: perpetual check

Author: John Merlino

Date: 14:50:12 10/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 16, 2001 at 16:02:42, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 16, 2001 at 14:24:00, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On October 16, 2001 at 11:13:38, John Merlino wrote:
>>
>>>On October 16, 2001 at 07:58:15, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>this is a position from a blitz game Hossa - Sjeng:
>>>>
>>>>[D]7k/4QP2/7p/6rP/8/1K6/6r1/8 b
>>>>
>>>>For a human it's obvious that this is a draw. Hossa was rather clueless and
>>>>thought that white was winning. Are there any engines which show a draw value at
>>>>once (without significant search depth)?
>>>>
>>>>Greetings,
>>>>Steffen.
>>>
>>>Chessmaster 8000 sees the draw in less than a second:
>>>
>>>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>>>0:00	1/3	1.18	7319		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3
>>>0:00	2/4	0.95	23824		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2
>>>0:00	3/5	0.00	45109		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>0:01	4/6	0.00	110883		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>0:02	5/7	0.00	246089		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>0:04	6/8	0.00	498686		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>0:08	7/9	0.00	1039196		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>0:16	8/10	0.00	2092486		1...R2g3+ 2. Kc2 Rg2+ 3. Kd3 R2g3+
>>>					4. Kc4 R3g4+ 5. Kc3 Rg3+ 6. Kb2
>>>					Rg2+ 7. Kc1 Rg1+ 8. Kd2 R1g2+ 9.
>>>					Ke3 R2g3+ 10. Ke2 Rg2+ 11. Kf1
>>>					Rg1+ 12. Kf2 R1g2+ 13. Ke3
>>>
>>>jm
>>
>>
>>It isn't seeing "the draw".  It is seeing "a draw".
>
>
>
>I do not know
>The score is positive at depth 2/4 when the main line is 22 plies
>so it can see advantage for white and only later changes it's opinion to draw
>score.
>
>  "the draw" is way deep
>>here.  "the draw" is probably beyond 40 plies deep.
>
>It is possible that it can see 40 plies at depth 3/5 or bigger depthes
>45109 positions may be enough if you search the right lines.
>
>I do not know.
>
>Uri

The X/Y depth variables are defined as:

X = depth of brute force search
Y = MINIMUM depth of "nominal search" (as Johan calls it). Basically, this is
the depth of the shortest extension.

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.