Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 06:21:48 05/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 1998 at 08:47:17, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >NT typically doesn't do this. So unless memory has reached a critical >lower bound, nothing should be swapped at all... one debugging test you >could do is to simply echo *everything* you read right back to stdout, >maybe like this: > >input="this was sent by winboard" > >then the debug file will show the quit being sent by winboard, and your >echo will show when/if you read it in... then we can see better what is >going >on... Yes, that could be a help. It would be even better if all debug output (including winboard's) had some kind of time stamp. > >And don't take criticism too seriously. I get *plenty* of complaints. >They are part of the "freeware" game it seems... I bet, you know very well. This kind of remote diagnostics/speculation is a little bit unfortunate. You have to rely on people which you don't know, who are using platforms you don't know and program versions you don't know. Usually, no chance to reproduce things at home - an unpleasant situation (at least for me). But I guess, one gets used to it. Anyway, thanks for your remarks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.