Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 08:15:38 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 11:09:08, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 10:33:23, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 10:31:41, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: >> >>>That *is* the point. I know every master in my area. When I play one who is weak >>>in the ending, I try to exploit that, just as he knows me, and tries to exploit >>>my weaknesses. When I play Tiger, I know it is relatively weak if I can lock the >>>pawns (as an example). To you, this is 'anti-computer' play. To me, I am playing >>>it just like I would *anybody else*; going after it's weaknesses and avoid it's >>>strengths. To me, that is normal chess. >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Chris >>> >>I mean anti comp openings, sorry if i was not clear about that, but i thought >>that was implicit. > >So, that means forbidding certain openings for the human? >Then the computer should play without book ;-) > In this case yes, the challenge implies that (not in general though), and sure i wouldn't mind holding up my end of the challenge, and furthermore not using the comp book. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.