Author: José Carlos
Date: 09:15:02 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 10:26:41, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 09:43:05, José Carlos wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 09:13:13, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2001 at 09:06:11, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:58:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:41:16, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:33:09, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I said the requirements of the challenge was objective, not that the definition >>>>>>>of anti comp play was clearly defined objectively!! >>>>>> >>>>>>If you by requirements mean conditions, then you clearly listed "no anti-comp" >>>>>>play as a condition. So the requirements cannot be said to be objective. Unless >>>>>>you by requirement means conditions minus "no anti-comp play" ;-). >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>Mogens >>>>> >>>>>And i could say: if your wordplay was what i said ( transformed into your words) >>>>>then you are right, but the objective was: can anyone beat one of the best progs >>>>>at 40/120 on fast hardware, without anti comp play? >>>>>The term anti comp is there for a reason and most people know what i am talking >>>>>about when i say anti comp. >>>>>Actually conditions as a term is quite subjective and requires some willingness >>>>>to accept that the conditions might not be ones own defenition, everything is >>>>>relative even when attemted to be put into perspective mogens ;) >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Jonas >>>> >>>> Can you define anti comp play? I'd be willing to play if I knew what are you >>>>talking about. >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>>The question is not if i can define anti comp play, but if anyone here following >>>a known mainline that leads to some equality, can beat one of the top 5 progs in >>>40/120 conditions (on fast hardware) for example: would you be willing to play a >>>comp using the first 3 moves of Ruy Lopez under the above mentioned conditions? >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >> If after the first 3 moves of Ruy López I am free to play whatever moves I >>want, I'll play. Of course I can't say for sure I'm gonna win (I'm under FIDE >>2200 right now), but I will try. How do you plan to set such a game? On ICC? >> José C. > >We can do this at the F7 server in a couple of days using the first 3 moves of >Ruy lopez 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3Bb5.... > >You can choose color, and play whatever you want beyond that line. > >I will be using Chesstiger 14.0 (without the opponent is human box checked to >make it fair) running on an Athlon T-bird 1.3 Ghz 1.5 GB ram. > >Regards >Jonas Ok. It must be saturday evening or sunday. The rest of the week, I 'live' in the office. I'll ask my girl for permission to play :) José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.