Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 09:32:55 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 12:27:27, Dan Andersson wrote: >The 'definition' is still subjective. It's more like a gut feeling or somesuch. >You would have to disambiguate it before it becomes a true definition. >Operationalization is the keyword: It should be made perfectly clear beforehand >what is, and what is not an anti computer strategy. Agreeing on a variation or >start position might be one way. There are others, lottery? Most strong >chessplayers would probably play for a draw and pocket the win if the computer >drops the ball. Is that anti comp?! > >MvH Dan Andersson Like i said it is obviously an individual assesment, and therefore it should be left up to the individual accepting this challenge not to use hi's or her own variation of "anti comp" play. Jose C has already accepted the challenge which will probably take place on sunday on F7 server. Openening line will be 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5.. he choose's what color he plays and the line he wishes to follow that with. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.