Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 14:52:19 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 09:21:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 09:05:53, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 07:54:59, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2001 at 06:59:22, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>On November 08, 2001 at 06:35:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>Can anyone here beat the "best" prog in 40/120 without using anti comp >>>>>strtegies? on atleast an Athlon 1000? >>>>> >>>>>I have seen a lot of post where people draw the comps when trying to do nothing >>>>>but that, but i am yet to see someone not using anti comp strategies beat them >>>>>in a 40/120 on fast hardware..... anyone up for the challenge? >>>> >>>>What's the point of not playing anticomputer strategies? >>>> >>>>-- >>>>GCP >>> >>>The point being: 1. A GM of conciderable strength would not play anti comp. >>>2.If a program has a fault which can be taken advantage of by using anti comp >>>strategies making it look like a 2000 player there is no point in playing it, >> >>>just like using the same line to beat the comp to determine it's strength. >> >>Booklearning? > >Book learning or Position learning is not going to help if the player use the >same line against another copy of the program. > >Uri Nice quoting/cliping :) ogm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.