Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 18:51:13 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 21:48:07, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 21:40:54, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>Hi Jonas, >> >>>And what do you mean by: "Human obviously is better when time gets better for >>>him." do you have any proof of that? I am sure that a lot of programmers and >>>Human GM's disagree.. >> >>I fully agree with Vincent here - Just look on the chess servers - compared to >>humans computers are much better in Blitz then in longer terms... you see that >>on any server, ratings in so called standard are always lower for nearly any >>engine then in blitz. And as longer the time gets as better it is for humans - >>look at correspondance chess. >> >>Greets, Thomas > >The ratings drop too for humans when you look at their standard rating, compared >to thir blits rating... > >Regards >Jonas Aslo there seem to be an inclination to play blitz oner standard games, so both comps and humans will meet all levels of players whereas most (strong) humans will play comps at long TC's and weak human players tend to wanna blitz.. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.