Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 15:11:04 11/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2001 at 17:58:07, Jesper Antonsson wrote: >On November 18, 2001 at 16:38:12, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>On November 18, 2001 at 12:48:37, Jesper Antonsson wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 2001 at 11:03:39, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >>> >>>>On November 18, 2001 at 04:42:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>>>>The real gain would be to marry the hardware of D.B. to the software algoritms >>>>>of Fritz7 or Chess Tiger IMHO. >>>> >>>>Yep, that programs with 200 MNPS should be much more stronger than Deep Blue... >>> >>>Again, that seems like speculation to me. >> >>Yes it is. >> >>I think I would win a bet here anyway :) > >Well, I doubt it, partly because such a Fritz wouldn't be tuned for the speed, >partly because I doubt that their eval is better. But, if you wait 10 years or >so (hopefully), when you can run at 200 Mnps on a serial machine, and then run >new software on that machine, I think *that* machine would be much stronger than >DB, for several reasons. :-) Deep Blue was tuned for its speed, so that is an advantadge for it, but even that way, I hope programs of today can still run on that machine and that they are tested a lot to convince anyone about any conclusion. Time will tell... let stop speculations! :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.